Poor bastard. What a way to live, on public view all his life. And good on him, for going for it anyway.
Is this why y'all have the royals?
Groping whatever. What really needs to be investigated is the plastic surgeon who gave that girl hard grapefruits for breasts.
Your prince, then, does he *go*, eh? Nudge, nudge, know what i mean? candid photography eh?... nudge nudge...
Those are flesh-colored coconuts, no?
In fact this is probably all taken out of context. I bet he's just helping her with her lawsuit.
He's helping her with her suit alright.
Looks a little tight to me.
Or maybe he's just helping himself.
Opus: "Good Lord, they planted cantaloupes!"
I find it unutterably tragic when I see such horrific implants...ugh!
Excellent post.
Is this why y'all have the royals?
Look, I'll admit they went downhill after George Brett retired, but you don't just abandon them because of that.
how come royalty never gropes me like that? and could Wills look any hotter fucked up?
The royals may come back. Buddy Bell's a good guy.
Cripes, Wolof, you made me snort beer out my nose. Ow.
*nominates post for breast of the web*
Every time a member of the British Royal family gropes some bird or shags a pr0n star, it is GOOD FOR BRITAIN.
Takes me back to the days of Randy Andy.
I mean, what else are they expected to do with their time? Put on funny costumes, go to war & open things. Not much, is it? Pretty boring. If they can't get squiffy & feel up some Sloane Ranger tart, then life's getting pretty sad, for us and them!
Which makes me wonder, what does a Royal Prince say when he's opening a woman's legs? "I hereby declare these labia open .. mmmffppplmblblbl! Plffffssslrrrpp!!"
'It's good to be the King'
It took a Royal Deed to get Chy back. Yes!
Monkeyfilter: mmmffppplmblblbl! Plffffssslrrrpp!!
I'm only back for a day, I borrowed me' nuncle's computer. New one next week, probably. I'm fiddling about with my old HD etc burning off stuff.
Can't wait to get you back for good, Chy.
Also, this bird that Harry groped.. she isn't all that great. I looked her up on Google, & she looks a bit naff. Can't he do better than that?
/horrible sexism
He looks very much drunk.
He's lucky he didn't end up groping one of his bodyguards.
Rather presumptuous of you to assume that wasn't one of his bodyguards.
/points @ flongj's profile
Galactic Judo!!!
(strange, I was only reading about MODOK last night...)
Also, this bird that Harry groped.. she isn't all that great. I looked her up on Google, & she looks a bit naff. Can't he do better than that?
/horrible realism
To be fair, Harry isn't all that great, either. He should grow a beard.
In fact this is probably all taken out of context.
Yes, just checking for any dangerous gels or liquids, surely. Even during off-hours, a royal has to see for the safety of his people!
"Wait, you're telling me that I have to take out my gel insoles before boarding the plane? Well, if that's the case, then that lady over there with the big ugly hoots better be taking her saline implants out of her shirt."
Whoa, so he's not gay?
I guess being drunk will do that to you though.
it's like the old joke:
q: what's the difference between a gay man and a bisexual man?
a: about five pints.
is harry the one who shares a house with his girlfriend near his barracks?
i know i could google this, but then there'd be a record somewhere of my googling information about the royal family. and i don't want that.
It really makes me sick, to realise the heirs to the throne (actually not Harry, unless something 'terrible' happens) are just like any other snorting, braying, toff, private school wankers called 'Dan' or 'Toby'. Loathsome.
There's a whole class of people here who apparently exist purely to fall out of 'exclusive' nightclubs (i.e. ones no-one cool would be seen dead in) pissed out of their minds.
Full disclosure: I am a Republican, which is a very different thing in the UK.
All together now: "Waiting for the great leap forward..."
Well, at least she's a good, solid Aryan girl. (Yes, Harry's the Self-Godwinning Prince.)
But seriously; I know lots of young men who never behave like that, and find constructive ways to let off steam.
He was merely adjusting her breasts. She'd fainted, and they shifted all out of whack.
Issues of sexual assault aside, perhaps it's a libidinous improvement over the methods of his father, The Tampon Who Would Be King...
TUM you liar! You do not!
And anyway if you rabble are done with your cheap hooting, I can finally reveal to you that it so happens the young Prince was giving the final go-ahead for the Israel-Lebanon cease fire through the latest in cryptologic communication systems, the NAT-6900.
Yes the transmission switch looks like a synthetic breast. God, sometimes you all really are such children!
the tampon who would be king
oh, that's good...
cryptologic communication systems, the NAT-6900.
Come in, Tokyo.
*pinch squeek pinch*
They would have probably grown up to be normal well-balanced individuals. Sadly they fell under the influence of their father and grandfather both of who can only be described as moral and ethical low lives
Final result 'a chip off the old block'
Truly Phil the Greek is one of the slimest individuals I have ever met
Are you talking about the princes or the breasts?
Come in, Tokyo.
Wasn't it 'Tune In, Tokyo', so you'd get the acronym?
That makes it too easy, Capt.
A man's gotta work for his funny.
Aah. I have so much to learn still...
if only he would touch me that way
Are you talking about the princes or the beasts?
Is your default encryption 1,024 bit? Do you transmit split-band scatter frequency across multiple platforms? With subcutaneous bass resonance keychecking?
Uh huh. Keep walkin'.
Mobkeyfilter: you rabble
He's just the latest in a long line of roués and whoremongers to grace our ruling dynasties. The surprise would be for a scion of these inbred descendents of assorted armed banditti and blood-soaked usurpers to turn out to be a worthwhile human being.
Now c'mon Abiezer tell us how you *really* feel about them.
Sorry to be all dour and everything, but how is the real story here an indiscreet prince, and not the unbelievable perfidy of the tabloid press? These guys wiretapped a guy's house and wrote newspaper stories about the things they illegally heard in his private phone calls, then when he had the temerity to complain they published embarrassing pictures of his son on the front page. I mean there's bad like copping a drunken feel, and there's bad like illegal wiretaps and backhanded blackmail.
In the interests of declaring my bias, I don't make it a secret around here that I'm most definitely not a republican, so that might be colouring my impression of the incident, but the way I see it the institution being dragged through the gutter here is just as important and far more powerful than the monarchy: the free press. When the press steps outside the law, it degrades support for the laws protecting it. When the press attacks the individual, it besmirches it's duty to protect the individual. When the press reports news with an agenda, it destroys the public trust in the very possibility of balanced discourse. This isn't just an attack on the royals, or the crown, or its supporters, or the constitutional order of the state, or the right to privacy; this is an attack on the respectability of investigative journalism and a an aid and comfort for those who contend that seeking the truth is nothing but muckraking.
Ok, rant over. You can go back to being funny now.
Darn. I was going to go with:
MonkeyFilter: the latest in a long line of roués and whoremongers
But then:
MonkeyFilter: it destroys the public trust in the very possibility of balanced discourse.
ohh . . . What Would GramMa Do?
probably:
MonkeyFilter: What Would GramMa Do?
Right there with you, Dreadnought.
Monkeyfilter: inbred descendents of assorted armed banditti and blood-soaked usurpers
P.S. pete, you're probably right
Dreadnought, I do agree with you as far as press intrusion is concerned. Private Eye has a good listing this week of paparazzi pictures that have been used this week, 9 years after Princess Diana died, and the tabloids vowed never to use them again.
The Scum's pictures, by the way, are actually three years old, and quite possibly stolen and published without permission of the owner.
The Sun's front page and centre-spread photographs of Prince Harry groping and kissing a girl are three years old and were not taken this summer as the newspaper claims today, according to Clarence House.
There also appears to be a question mark over how the photographs came to be published, with Clarence House claiming that their owner, Natalie Pinkham - the girl whose breast Prince Harry is pictured fondling - did not give her permission for them to be printed.
The Sun's page one, headlined "Dirty Harry" and tagged "picture exclusive", claims that the six photographs were taken "this summer in trendy nightclub Boujis".
But Paddy Haverson, Prince Charles' communications secretary, told MediaGuardian.co.uk that the pictures were taken at another nightclub, Purple, in September 2003 - before Prince Harry began dating his current girlfriend Chelsy Davy.
We have more photos of this depraved incident — so filthy we cannot publish them in a family newspaper!
My confidence in the Sun's reporting has been seriously undermined by this incident. I shall inform their ombudsman forthwith!
Natalie Pinkham - the girl whose breast Prince Harry is pictured fondling - did not give her permission -
I'm sorry, I'm sorry - hold on just a minute. Pinkham?
*snkk* hee hee!
*cough* Yes, well, quite right then to correct this journalistic faux pas as soon as possible. Very good Mr. Haverson, carry on.
*snif*
according to private eye, the photos came from max clifford in a clever trade.
clifford learned that the sun had photos of one of his clients embracing a woman other than his wife. he offered the old photos of harry on condition that the sun suppress the story on his client...
Aah, the good old Currant Bun. Keeping the standards of journalism flying proud as ever.
hotterfucked up?